Isaiah 49:15

Old Testament Major Prophet ASV (1901)

What does Isaiah 49:15 say?

The American Standard Version records this verse as: “Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? yea, these may forget, yet will not I forget thee.” Read the surrounding verses and the named sources below before drawing broader conclusions.

The verse

Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? yea, these may forget, yet will not I forget thee.
Isaiah 49:15 — American Standard Version

Context — Isaiah 49

American Standard Version (1901) — public domain. Click any verse for its study page.
15Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? yea, these may forget, yet will not I forget thee.

What do historical commentaries say?

John Gill's Exposition
John Gill (1697–1771) · Exposition of the Old and New Testament · 18th-century historical commentary
“Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? &c.] This is the Lord’s answer to the church’s complaint, instancing in the care and affection of a mother to her child, thereby illustrating his love to his people; he instances in a “woman”, the tender sex; in a “child” of her’s, an infant, not one grown up, from which her affections might be alienated by disobedience; her suckling child, she had in her arms, and on her knees, and whom her breasts would put her in mind of; and since one that is not an own child may be suckled, it is called “the son of her womb”; and is it possible for such an one to be forgotten? yea, they may forget; through…”
Read attributed excerpt →
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown
Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset & David Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible · 19th-century historical commentary
“(Isa 44:21; Psa 103:13; Mat 7:11).”
Read attributed excerpt →
Barnes' Notes
Albert Barnes (1798–1870) · Notes on the Whole Bible · 19th-century historical commentary
“Can a woman forget her sucking child? - The design of this verse is apparent. It is to show that the love which God has for his people is stronger than that which is produced by the most tender ties created by any natural relation. The love of a mother for her infant child is the strongest attachment in nature. The question here implies that it was unusual for a mother to be unmindful of that tie, and to forsake the child that she should nourish and love. That she should not have compassion - That she should not pity and succor it in times of sickness and distress; that she should see it suffer without any attempt to relieve it, and turn away, and see it die unpitied and unalleviated. Yea,…”
Read attributed excerpt →
Treasury of Scriptural Knowledge
R. A. Torrey and contributors · The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge · Cross-reference reference work
“a woman: Kg1 3:26, Kg1 3:27; Psa 103:13; Mal 3:17; Mat 7:11 that she should not have compassion: Heb. from having compassion they may: Lev 26:29; Deu 28:56, Deu 28:57; Kg2 6:28, Kg2 6:29, Kg2 11:1, Kg2 11:2; Lam 4:3, Lam 4:10; Rom 1:31 yet: Isa 44:21; Jer 31:20; Hos 11:1; Rom 11:28, Rom 11:29 Isaiah 49:16”
Read attributed excerpt →

Related study paths

Sources and verification