Acts 19:37

New Testament Historical ASV (1901)

What does Acts 19:37 say?

The American Standard Version records this verse as: “For ye have brought [hither] these men, who are neither robbers of temples nor blasphemers of our goddess.” Read the surrounding verses and the named sources below before drawing broader conclusions.

The verse

For ye have brought [hither] these men, who are neither robbers of temples nor blasphemers of our goddess.
Acts 19:37 — American Standard Version

Context — Acts 19

American Standard Version (1901) — public domain. Click any verse for its study page.
37For ye have brought [hither] these men, who are neither robbers of temples nor blasphemers of our goddess.

What do historical commentaries say?

John Gill's Exposition
John Gill (1697–1771) · Exposition of the Old and New Testament · 18th-century historical commentary
“For ye have brought hither these men, etc.] The Arabic version reads, “these two men”; that is, Gaius and Aristarchus, whom they had brought by force into the theatre to fight with wild beasts: which are neither robbers of churches; or “temples”; or, as the Arabic version renders it, “robbers of the vessels of the temple”, sacrilegious persons; they have not stolen anything out of the temple of Diana, nor any other: nor yet blasphemers of your goddess; they have not made mention of her name, much less said anything against her, at least this officer did not know that they had; and if he had, he did not stick to tell an officious lie to screen them, as did the Egyptian midwives in favour of…”
Read attributed excerpt →
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown
Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset & David Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible · 19th-century historical commentary
“For ye have brought hither these men, which are neither robbers of churches--"temple-plunderers," or sacrilegious persons. nor yet blasphemers of your goddess--This is a remarkable testimony, showing that the apostle had, in preaching against idolatry, studiously avoided (as at Athens) insulting the feelings of those whom he addressed--a lesson this to missionaries and ministers in general.”
Read attributed excerpt →
Barnes' Notes
Albert Barnes (1798–1870) · Notes on the Whole Bible · 19th-century historical commentary
“For ye ... - Demetrius and his friends. The blame was to be traced to them. Which are neither robbers of churches - The word “churches” we now apply to edifices reared for purposes of Christian worship. Since no such churches had then been built, this translation is unhappy, and is not at all demanded by the original. The Greek word ἱεροσύλους hierosulous is applied properly to those who commit sacrilege; who plunder temples of their sacred things. The meaning here is that Paul and his companions had not been guilty of robbing the temple of Diana, or any other temple. The charge of sacrilege could not be brought against them. Though they had preached against idols and idol worship, yet…”
Read attributed excerpt →
Wesley's Explanatory Notes
John Wesley (1703–1791) · Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament and Old Testament notes · 18th-century historical commentary
“Nor blasphemers of your goddess - They simply declared the one God, and the vanity of idols in general. Acts 19:38”
Read attributed excerpt →
Treasury of Scriptural Knowledge
R. A. Torrey and contributors · The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge · Cross-reference reference work
“which: Act 25:8; Co1 10:32; Co2 6:3 Acts 19:38”
Read attributed excerpt →

Related study paths

Sources and verification