Every week, one Greek or Hebrew word changes how you read a familiar passage. Subscribe free →
BibleWord.ai iconBibleWord.ai

Attributed commentary excerpt

John Gill's Exposition on Matthew 21:9

A historical reference excerpt for this verse. Read it alongside the biblical text and other available sources.

Exposition of the Old and New Testament
John Gill (1697–1771) · 18th-century historical commentary
Source: BibleWord.ai's local reference edition of this named work.
And the multitudes that went before, etc.] That is, that went before Christ; accordingly the Syriac, Arabic, Persic, and Ethiopic versions, and Munster’s Hebrew Gospel, read, “that went before him”: these seem to be the much people that met him from Jerusalem, and that followed him; which were perhaps those that came from Jericho, and other parts; cried, saying, Hosanna to the Son of David: by calling Jesus the Son of David, they owned and proclaimed him to be the Messiah; this being the usual title by which the Messiah was known among the Jews; see the note on (<400101>Matthew 1:1) and by crying and saying Hosanna to him, which was done with loud acclamations, and the united shouts of both companies, before and behind; they ascribe all praise, honour, glory, and blessing to him, and wish him all prosperity, happiness, and safety. The word is an Hebrew word, and is compounded of an, and h[yçwh, which signifies, “save I beseech”; and which words stand in (<19B825>Psalm 118:25) to which the multitude had reference, as appears from what follows; and are formed into one word, an[çwh, “Hosana”, or “Hosanna”, in which form it frequently appears in the Jewish writings; and because of the often use of it at the feast of tabernacles, that feast was called “Hosanna”, and the seventh day of it was called hbr an[çwh, “the great Hosanna” f1093. Moreover, the “Lulabs”, or the bundles made of branches of palm trees, and boughs of willow and myrtle, which they carried in their hands at the feast of tabernacles, often go by this name: it is said f1094, “the Egyptian myrtle is right or fit an[çwhl, “for the Hosanna”.” That is, to be put into the “Lulab”, or bundle of boughs and branches, which was carried about, and shaken at the above feast. Again f1095, “it is a tradition of R. Meir, that it was the practice of the honourable men of Jerusalem, to bind their “Lulabs” with golden threads says Rabbah, these are they an[çwh yldgm, “that bind the Hosanna”: the gloss on it is, “that bind the Lulabs”, of the house of the head of the captivity; for in binding the Hosanna of the house of the head of the captivity, they leave in it an hand’s breadth and says the same Rabbah, a man may not hold an Hosanna in a linen cloth.” Once more f1096, “says R. Zera, a man may not prepare an[çwh, “an Hosanna” for a child, on a good day.” Sometimes the Hosanna seems to be distinguished from the “Lulab”, and then by the “Lulab” is meant, only the branches of palm tree; and by the Hosanna, the boughs of willow and myrtle; as when f1097, “Rabbah says, a man may not fix the “Lulab”, an[çwhb, “in the Hosanna”.” And a little after says the same, “a man may not bind the “Lulab” with the “Hosanna”.” Now these bundles might be so called, because they were lifted up and shaken, when the above words out of (<19B825>Psalm 118:25) were recited: for thus it is said f1098, “when do they shake, that is, their “Lulabs”, or “Hosannas?” At those words, “O give thanks unto the Lord”, (<19B801>Psalm 118:1) the beginning and end; and at those words, “Save now I beseech thee”, (<19B825>Psalm 118:25). The house of Hillell, and the house of Shammai say also at those words, “O Lord I beseech thee, send now prosperity”: says R. Akiba, I have observed Rabban Gamaliel and Rabbi Joshua, that all the people shook their Lulabs, but they did not shake, only at those words, Save now I beseech thee, O Lord.” Hence some have thought, that these are meant by the Hosanna in this text; and that the sense is, th…

This public page shows a contextual excerpt from the locally available source text.

How to use this source
This excerpt is attributed to its named commentary. It is included as a historical study resource and should be evaluated in light of Scripture and other relevant evidence.