Attributed commentary excerpt
John Gill's Exposition on Matthew 12:4
A historical reference excerpt for this verse. Read it alongside the biblical text and other available sources.
Exposition of the Old and New Testament
John Gill (1697–1771) · 18th-century historical commentary
Source: BibleWord.ai's local reference edition of this named work.
How he entered into the house of God, etc.] Not the temple, which was not then built; but the tabernacle, which was then at Nob, the city of the priests, and which probably adjoined to Abimelech’s house: and did eat the shewbread; for that this is meant by the hallowed bread, in (<092106>1 Samuel 21:6) is certain; though R. Joseph Kimchi f714 thinks it was the bread of the thank offering; to which R. Levi ben Getsom f715 seems to incline: but the general sense of the Jewish doctors f716 is, that it was the showbread; and which is very clear from that text, and is rightly affirmed by Christ; which was not lawful for him to eat, neither for them which were with him, but only for the priests: (see <032405>Leviticus 24:5,9) and so the Jews say that this bread µyrzl rwsa, “is forbidden to strangers” f717; that is, to any but the priests, which, after the burning of the frankincense, was divided equally among them: that course of priests that came into the service had six cakes, and that which went out six; though the high priest had a right to half himself, but he did not use to take it, it being judged not to his honour to do so f718. No hint is here given, nor in the history, in (<092101>1 Samuel 21:1) that it was on the sabbath day that David came to Ahimelech, and ate the showbread; but this is observed, and disputed, by the Jewish writers. Some indeed are in a doubt about it; but others f719 readily give into it, that it was on the sabbath day, which he chose to flee in, for the greater safety and preservation of his life: and indeed it seems reasonable it should be on that day; since on that day only the showbread was removed from the table, and other loaves put in the room. One of their writers f720 says, “that showbread was not to be eaten, but on the day, and night of the sabbath day; and on the going out of the sabbath day; and on the going out of the sabbath David came there.” Now our Lord’s argument stands thus, that if David, a holy, good man, and, the men that were with him, who were men of religion and conscience, when in great distress, through hunger, ate of the showbread, which was unlawful for any to eat of but priests, the high priest himself assenting to it; then it could not be criminal in his disciples, when an hungred, to pluck, rub, and eat a few ears of corn, which were lawful for any man to eat, even though it was on the sabbath day: and for the further vindication of them, he adds,
How to use this source
This excerpt is attributed to its named commentary. It is included as a historical study resource and should be evaluated in light of Scripture and other relevant evidence.
