John Gill's Exposition on Genesis 45:10

A historical reference excerpt for this verse. Read it alongside the biblical text and other available sources.

Exposition of the Old and New Testament
John Gill (1697–1771) · 18th-century historical commentary
Source: BibleWord.ai's local reference edition of this named work.

And thou shall dwell in the land of Goshen, etc.] Called by Artapanus f1790 Kaisan or Kessan; the Septuagint version Gesan of Arabia, as it was that part of Egypt which bordered on Arabia: it seems to be the same with the land of Rameses, (see <014711>Genesis 47:11); and the Heliopolitan home, which, Strabo f1791 says, was reckoned to be in Arabia, and in which were both the city of Heliopolis and the city Heroopolis, according to Ptolemy f1792; for in the Septuagint version of (<014628>Genesis 46:28), instead of Goshen is Heroopolis, or the city of the Heroes in the land of Rameses, with which agrees Josephus f1793: wherefore Dr. Shaw f1794 observes, the land of Rameses or Goshen could be no other than the Heliopolitan home, taking in that part of Arabia which lay bounded near Heliopolis by the Nile, and near Heroopolis by the correspondent part of the Red Sea. Now either before this time Joseph had got a grant of this country, of Pharaoh, to dispose of at pleasure, or he had so much power and authority of himself as to put his father into it: or it may be, it was the domains of his father in law the priest of On, since On or Onii, according to Ptolemy f1795, was the metropolis of the Heliopolitan home, and by some thought to be Heliopolis itself, and perhaps might be Joseph’s own country, which he had with the daughter of the priest of On: indeed if what the Jewish writers say f1796, that Pharaoh, king of Egypt in Abraham’s time, gave to Sarah the land of Goshen for an inheritance, and therefore the Israelites dwelt in it, because it was Sarah their “mother’s”; it would account for Joseph’s proposing to put them into the possession of it without the leave of Pharaoh; but Goshen seems to have been in the grant of Pharaoh, who agreed and confirmed what Joseph proposed, (<014706>Genesis 47:6); and thou shalt be near unto me; as he would be in Goshen, if Memphis was the royal seat at this time, as some think f1797, and not Tanis or Zoan; or Heliopolis, or both, in their turn; and Artapanus f1798 is express for it, that Memphis was the seat of that king of Egypt, in whose court Moses was brought up; and especially Heliopolis, nay be thought to be so, if Joseph dwelt at On or Heliopolis, where his father in law was priest or prince, which was near if not in Goshen itself: and according to Bunting f1799 , On or Oni was the metropolis of Goshen; and Leo Africanus says f1800, that the sahidic province, in which was Fium, where the Israelites dwelt, (see <014711>Genesis 47:11), was the seat of the nobility of the ancient Egyptians: thou and thy children, and thy children’s children: for Jacob’s sons had all of them children, even Benjamin the youngest, as appears from the following chapter: and thy flocks, and thy herds, and all that thou hast; and Goshen, being a place of pasturage, was fit and suitable for them; and so Josephus says f1801, of Heliopolis, which he takes to be the place where Jacob was placed, that there the king’s shepherds had their pastures.

Read Genesis 45:10 →Read the full chapter →Barnes' Notes →Tyndale Open Study Notes →

How to use this source
This excerpt is attributed to its named commentary. It is included as a historical study resource and should be evaluated in light of Scripture and other relevant evidence.